I think there are really good prospects for that. Again, I argue that we should dig right in really hard and right now, and in a year's time or so, put this together.
There's no question that the world is moving towards more efficient vehicle technologies. The entire global market is going that way. So how can we lose by having an intelligently designed standard and a set of complementary measures to move the technology onto the market? That is what the standard will do; it'll increase the supply of fuel efficient technology. But then we have to push consumers along and we have to turn the stock over and we have to do research and development. If you put that together as a package and look at our own unique circumstances and design it properly, I have no doubt that we can make it a winner, not a loser.
Will there be some adjustments? Probably. But that's what you look at in designing the standard. Personally, I don't believe that, in fact, we're going to be better off sitting back and waiting on this one. I think we're going to be much better off digging in and thinking our way through it. I think we have all the intellectual capital in this country to do that, and in fairly rapid order.
We are short on data. I make the point that we don't have the kind of data the United States gets because of their corporate average fuel-economy standard. They do compel the information to be put on the table. We're short on data, so we're going to have to make some judgment calls. But I have no doubt that we can design a standard that works for us and the environment at the same time.