I make that point because it comes up commonly in the committee. I don't disagree with local action, but I think we need to think in that context.
There's something else that I think is important, and it's something that the committee is certainly seized with. It's on page 3 of the brief from the Lung Association. In talking about the amendments that Bill C-30 is proposing to CEPA and other legislation, you say:
Although all of the objectives of these amendments could be achieved by maximizing the use of existing acts such as CEPA, some amendments recommended by Bill C-30 strengthen the likelihood of better action; other proposed amendments risk reducing the likelihood of better action. It is extremely important that provisions under a Clean Air Act not weaken any of the provisions of CEPA.
I think that's an extremely important point you make, and you outline a number of ways in which we need to be cautious, moving forward, that we don't weaken the legislation.
The question I would have, then, is what most concerns you in looking at this? What stands out as the thing you're most concerned about in Bill C-30 in terms of undermining CEPA, the thing you think we should be most looking out for in the legislation as it's worded right now?