The difficulty, however, presented by that—and I hate to disagree with my cousin—is that 10 minutes for witnesses, followed, then, by seven, seven, and seven may leave us with very little time on one-hour rounds. I wonder if the committee could first make a decision on its own as to how long these sessions should be: 60 minutes, 90 minutes, or two hours, although I've not heard of many being two hours. But I think that would certainly change and get a better illustration of how we're going to share the time in terms of questioning.
Also, I, for one, believe that 10 minutes for opening statements by witnesses may be too long. I think it should be reduced to no more than seven minutes, and probably more like five minutes.