You have to think of these things all together, right? It all depends on how long the meetings are and how many witnesses there are, as the clerk was just mentioning. We have a significant number of witnesses to hear from. We've all heard from many of these witnesses already. They have asked for meetings. They've submitted documents. They'll submit documents at the hearings themselves.
I suggest that, number one, we limit opening statements to five minutes. I don't think we need to have ten-minute opening statements from every single witness. We could encourage them to submit information further to that.
My second suggestion would be that we hold 90-minute meetings, which would allow us to have ample time for questioning, and that we consider having five witnesses per meeting. If you do the math on that, you get 25 minutes for the opening statements from five witnesses. I'm amenable to the seven-minute opening round, which would take us to 53 minutes in total, and then we'd get a second round of five minutes per question. We'd be able to properly question witnesses. Those are my thoughts right off the bat.