My understanding is that when they introduced the law in the U.K., they made the threshold minimum sale price that's eligible for the resale right be roughly a thousand pounds. That actually was a recommendation so that more artists who are not the Damien Hirsts of the art market would receive more royalties.
If I look at a sale that happened in Canada, for example, in November at Heffel Auctions, there was one piece, as I mentioned, that was sold for $1.3 million, but the majority of resale royalties that would have gone to artists involved in that auction would have been considerably lower. There were about 13 artists involved in that sale where the royalties would have been between $350 and $4,400. So the majority of artists involved in that auction were not the big art stars who would be receiving huge royalties.