We're an international organization and we're very much involved in the efforts taking place in the United States addressing these issues. I think it's not fair to list one example—maybe for the Oscars or something—where a promotional video gets sent out. The industry has spent literally millions of dollars to educate, to enforce, and to try to bring about real change.
I think we can do things. We can change behaviour. You referred to the Criminal Code amendments that took place. Canada was one of the leading sources of illegal camcording of videos prior to the enactment of the amendments to the Criminal Code. Since that time, we have fallen off the radar—good thing—in terms of being a source for illegally camcorded motion pictures. It shows that if we do something right, if this committee does something right, we can change behaviour.
I hear people say this issue has gotten too big. No matter what you do, it's insurmountable. I disagree. We can change behaviour. It's about education. It's about letting people know there's a strong deterrent.
Madame Lavallée asked a number of questions about statutory damages. We think you should extend those damages to enablers, the hosting sites. That's really where a lot of the problem is happening.
I'll say it, because I think my friends are afraid to: sure, you should send them to jail. I don't think that's going to happen with this committee, but why not? They're stealing.