The bill as drafted provides too broad a safe harbour for what look like seemingly innocent hosting sites, which may have been designed for purposes other than for infringement. The specific language now restricts any type of liability, if they are specifically designed for that purpose. Well, they can be designed for that, but try to prove it.
Secondly, they can be manipulated for a whole host of other, more nefarious uses. That's one of the areas we see in which this bill has to be changed, for hosting sites—and they're proliferating.
With technology changes.... Every time I get a briefing, it's hard to stay on top of the technology changes, and we have to stay ever vigilant. That's one of the areas in which we see that action has to happen. If we don't go after the hosting sites, this will not have been a worthwhile exercise.