Okay.
Now I want to move on from that subject. Again, I see kind of a theme here. We talk about the notice and notice thing, and again you used the word “infringer” several times in regard to notice and notice. I think the whole point of notice and notice is that we don't know if the person is an infringer or not. You're assuming the person is an infringer or you might make an argument that the person is an infringer. But the whole concept of notice and notice is that there's a notice given that someone believes that something is an infringement and then that sets the table—of course there's sort of an order of things that happen there where the ISP has to retain identifying information, for example, as a result of the notice.
You wouldn't cut off someone's gas simply because someone says that maybe they broke a rule or something. You kind of have to prove that they're not paying their bills before you cut off their gas, right?