I've met with dozens and dozens--perhaps as many as 100--different legal experts on this bill, and I have as many as 100 different legal opinions on it, so I'm not surprised that some folks would come in and say that maybe it's not consistent, and then other people would come in and say it is absolutely consistent. Ultimately it was written largely or almost entirely by industry. Their legal experts have actually written the bill subject to those tests. We believe that legally it brings us up to our WIPO treaty requirements and is respectful of both the Supreme Court ruling and the Berne three-step test. That's the approach of the bill.
You actually outlined exactly where I think the government is going on TPMs, which I think is important. You talked about how the book industry, for example, has actually decided not to use locks. They've actually done that in the music industry with CDs as well. Consumers wouldn't accept them, so they don't use them. Other industries, such the movie industry, are now producing Blu-rays, and they are selling them with digital copy on them. Ultimately the market is going to drive whether locks are accepted or not and how businesses choose to use them, but that's what the bill respects.
Thank you very much for your time.