Thank you, Mr. Chair, and my thanks to our witnesses.
I notice how quickly you focused on the two issues that are the subject of most of the discussion around this table: the education exemption and the digital locks.
Let me deal with the first one. You've heard Ms. Lavallée already. After your appearance here, there will be publishers who will tell us that we are gutting their livelihoods and removing all their income. They suggest that up to 85% of their revenues will be gone.
I disagree with Ms. Lavallée. I think the proposal of the government is sound. It is an approach for the 21st century. Your approach is similar to ours, but you feel that we haven't gone far enough in that the educational exemption we've included is still too restrictive.
Could you expand on that and comment on the claims that the education exemption is going to remove the income of the publishers and the writers they represent?