Thank you.
I want to get to my second question, which has to do with digital locks. You've suggested that digital locks should not be able to trump the fair dealing rights. The problem I have....
I'm trying to get my mind around this. In order to make sure that the fair dealing rights aren't trumped, you're also going to have to remove the provisions that prohibit the manufacture and marketing of circumvention devices. You have to remove that because you have to provide consumers with a way of getting at the fair dealing content. If you do that, eventually consumers for the most part are going to have circumvention products available—software, hardware, whatever it is.
Doesn't that render digital locks meaningless, useless?