It is the ruling in the CCH case. That was the case involving CCH and the library of the Law Society of Upper Canada.
That ruling was of critical importance in terms of our approach to exceptions and the way exceptions are handled in Canadian law. I think that is where the difference is. Prior to the CCH decision, exceptions provided for in copyright legislation were interpreted in a restrictive manner. There weren't many in the Act. The principle that lawyers around the country have all been taught--