No, I can give you a specific example.
Two years ago, we used the U.S. notice and takedown procedure to shut down an Internet site. That Internet site was selling illegal reproductions of books for educational purposes. We did an investigation, prepared a file, signed a statement under oath, forwarded it to a U.S. Internet services provider and the site was shut down. So, we're not talking about minor use; we're talking about serious use, which had an impact on the rights of creators. The site was shut down on the basis of solid allegations, that were verified, and on a solid case that was substantiated. We're not talking about someone acting on a whim—if he gets up one morning and decides he is going to have a website shut down because he doesn't like it. We are mainly talking about the possibility of shutting down sites where it can be demonstrated that they have a serious negative impact. On the face of our own documents and by looking at the site, we knew that it was an illegal operation, and the site was shut down.