I think the question is probably a fair one for the CCLA, and although Madame Des Rosiers will have the last word and it's not in our brief, I'm quite confident that she and her organization would not want to see overly repressive and disproportionate penalties levied on individuals or on educational institutions.
One of the things that is specifically in our brief—she didn't get a chance to get to it, although she alluded to it en passant—is there's a very good need for, and other organizations such as the AUCC have suggested there should be, a specific provision in the bill whereby if an educational institution or anybody involved with an educational institution believes in good faith that they are engaged in fair dealing, such a situation should be immune from statutory damages.
There's an exactly similar provision in the United States that has been there since 1976. Nobody's complaining about it. There's no reason that we shouldn't have a similar provision in Canada. It's very simple.