I would just like to finish explaining our argument, if you don't mind. We do not think it is appropriate to restrict access to information and relevant research, particularly for the most disadvantaged members of our society, because that truly is a bridge to better things. That is the problem. If we think that doing something to support the right to education and access to information minimizes something else, and that there is no other solution, then I think we will be losing out and that we won't be approaching the debate from the proper perspective.
On February 10th, 2011. See this statement in context.