Indeed, I think “such as” does not broaden per se, because once you say “such as”, the judge must interpret that in light of the list that's being.... It prevents too narrow an interpretation and it allows for future possibilities to be argued on the basis that they are similar to satire, parody, and so on.
The point we're making here is that there are some pressures to restrict what has been done in the interpretation of “research”, the interpretation that was put forward by the Supreme Court, and we want to prevent further restrictions of what has happened. This is a tool that we are suggesting should be looked at to ensure that the liberal way in which “research” has been proposed to be interpreted continues.
Certainly, I think CCLA wants to protect--