I will give a quick response. There are those like the isoHunts of this world that are built on an advertising revenue and are commercial operations and make money. There is no question about that. However, in the piracy ecosystem out there, there are many people who do not operate for commercial gain; still, the commercial damage they cause to copyright owners is massive. For film and television content you have something they call topsites, which are FTP servers that house the most valuable content, content that is still in the theatres and that has been recently released on DVD. Those topsites are operated by people who do it for Internet credibility, because they want to do it and because within their own peer group it allows them to move up by a level.
Let me give you an idea of what the scale is, though. A topsite that was recently taken down by a Dutch organization, BREIN, had 220 terabytes. One terabyte is 1,000 gigabytes, and 1,000 gigabytes is 250 feature-length films. These people are not doing it for commercial gain. They're doing it for Internet notoriety. We had a gentleman stand up in front of Minister Clement at the Toronto town hall and brag that he had a six-terabyte server filled with Canadian films he was letting people download all over the world. He's not doing it for commercial gain. If you have a statutory damages provision that says to these people that they can cause as much damage as they want and the most they will ever be liable for is $5,000, you're going to encourage those operations in Canada, not deter them.