Generally speaking, I do not understand why, when people have been acknowledged to hold certain rights, those rights should be taken away at certain times for certain uses. That shows a lack of trust in copyright holders; it's telling them that they are not being reasonable about certain uses of their works—in the education sector, for example—in terms of arriving at a solution that satisfies both parties. It shows a lack of confidence that the two parties will succeed in negotiating a commercial agreement—a business arrangement that both consider satisfactory.
For example, the Quebec Ministry of Education pays royalties for the use of protected works by the schools for school and extracurricular work. We were able to arrive at an agreement. The Ministry of Education did not go bankrupt as a result. On the contrary, it enhanced young peoples' education, as they understand that when they use a protected work, they have to pay in order to be entitled to use it.
Generally speaking, I do not support the principle of granting exceptions. I think we are all adult enough to be able to negotiate agreements that satisfy both parties.