I actually reject the term “intellectual property”, because it causes a lot of confusion, and it's a confusion I've heard among members of Parliament. There is confusion about what is a trademark and what is copyright. The term “intellectual property” causes a fair bit of confusion. It also causes a fair bit of confusion as to the nature of the harm of infringement. I would compare infringement to such an intangible property as trespass, not theft.
So I reject the term “intellectual property”, but I strongly support copyright. I support patents. I support the consumer protection aspects of trademark law and anti-counterfeiting. It's the term “intellectual property” I reject.