Part of the solution would definitely be to have an exemption in the private copying system for everything that can potentially be used to copy music, for all devices that are designed, created and marketed to make copies of musical works. That's one of the possible solutions.
On the other hand, you're getting into a broader debate, concerning illegal exchanges that are currently being done over the Internet. In their briefs, the UDA and Artisti have advocated a basic solution in which there should at least be a "notice and withdrawal" system. Such a system would make it possible to withdraw content as soon as there is any indication of illegal activity on the Internet and thus to prevent files from being increasingly exchanged and from being accessible to more people illegally. That's one option.
We also advanced a model during the consultations that had been developed in France by Mr. Patissier. That model also calls for payment of financial consideration that would be collected by Internet service providers. They benefit—perhaps involuntarily—from the significant economic impact of illegal downloading. Whether we like it or not, with illegal downloading, there is very high bandwidth use and, as a result of that heavy traffic, providers can charge ever-increasing amounts to download more content.