Yes. I think we're going too far into the technical protection measures. You must remember that the WIPO treaties were signed in 1996 and that technology has vastly changed, a fact that has been emphasized on numerous occasions. It is virtually no longer being used. Moreover, a lot of people wondered whether this was copyright. A technology is being protected, and it was already sanctioned in any case.
There's the right of access, for example, which is a good thing. There are definitely measures that enable us to head in the direction of certain provisions of the WIPO treaties because reference is generally made to them. However, on the whole, I believe this doesn't pass the WIPO test and that a "notice and withdrawal" system, for example—which has often been emphasized—would be much more effective than technical protection measures.
In this case, there's no attempt to involve access providers, and that's why they applaud, but I believe they're part of the equation.