Yes. I have a point of order specifically concerning the exchange between Mr. Del Mastro and Ms. Atwood, but this should also apply to all of our meetings.
When one witness speaks to us by videoconference, it is hard for that person to answer questions and to explain his or her point of view if that person's interlocutor constantly interrupts, especially when the latter leaves the microphone on and tends to always leave it on
Mr. Chairman, it then becomes impossible for the witness to state his or her point of view as the volume of the witness's microphone is much lower than that of the microphone of the person asking the questions.
This concerns the debate we are having today, but I would like us to take this into account in all cases in future where an individual is invited to testify by videoconference. We have to respect the witnesses and the fact that they are taking the time to speak to us.