Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to our witnesses for being here this afternoon.
Professor Azzaria, in your opening statement you used some terms and descriptions of Bill C-32. For example, you said you thought it was a bit of a legal puzzle. You also said you thought it was opaque. I might suggest that those descriptions more appropriately apply to some of the presentations we've heard before this committee, including the ones today.
In any event, I'd like to try to get some more specifics, because you've made some broad statements.
As well, in your opening statement you said you thought the bill needed a little bit of housekeeping, but then in a response to a question you suggested the whole thing should be scrapped. Which is it?