I want to go to the sense of a two-tier set of rights being created. I doubt that would even pass a court test, that you can define rights in legislation but they don't exist in the digital realm, where everything is moving.
I'm concerned with the technological protection measures—again there is the law of unintended consequences, as much as we want to protect property from being unfairly ripped off and put on isoHunt—in terms of education whether or not they will have a huge impact. I'm looking at the state of California, and you had mentioned them. They're putting $500 million in the next four years to create online, accessible, open education resources that will be available to anyone using the Internet. Whether or not the move in the United States with people will get around the technological protection measures by creating open education, would that encourage something at the University of Athabasca to start using those open education materials and perhaps in the end leave many of our national and regional publishers in the lurch if we're still under the technological protection regime?