Both of you spoke of the broad consultations we undertook. In fact, I believe the government undertook the broadest consultation in history in putting this bill together. We received thousands of submissions, electronically and otherwise. What we heard time and time again were artists asking for protection from this piracy. They were saying that their work has value and needs protection so that it can't be stolen on the Internet. The bill seeks to do that.
We also heard from chambers of commerce saying to construct a business model. I'm not going to adopt a common defeatist attitude, namely, that illegal copying is going to go on no matter what, so we need a levy. Perhaps you could both speak to what the chambers of commerce, the recording industry, our international partners say about where the bill is going, the intent of the bill, and what they believe the effect of it will be.