I was mentioning the related clauses. The deck is not comprehensive; it is only meant to support my presentation.
Is that all right?
On November 25th, 2010. See this statement in context.
Assistant Deputy Minister, Cultural Affairs, Department of Canadian Heritage
I was mentioning the related clauses. The deck is not comprehensive; it is only meant to support my presentation.
Is that all right?
See context to find out what was said next.