I have a couple of things. To Mr. Angus's last point, I think maybe we're coming to a place where we can find a little bit of a compromise here. We've said three witnesses per meeting for an hour, but if ACTRA is coming and we know we're hearing from artists and maybe we want to add five or six witnesses to that meeting, they'll just have to split the time accordingly, but it might give an opportunity to hear from more people. It might cost us a couple of questioning rounds, or whatever the case is, but it might be a good way to hear from more witnesses.
So maybe that's a compromise. At a meeting where we'd normally have three witnesses, maybe at that particular meeting, when ACTRA's here anyway and there are several ACTRA members who want to participate in the meeting, maybe they can come to that meeting as well. So I'll throw that out there.
In relation to Mr. Rodriguez's comment about leaving the witness list open, and Mr. Cardin kind of commented on that a little bit too, I'm cautiously in favour of that, I guess I'd say. I think there might be people who aren't on this list right now who as the debate goes on want to add their point of view to the mix. Now, in many cases those people can submit briefs, or whatever the case is, but we may want to hear, and we may decide as a committee that we want to hear from some of those people, so I don't want to write it in stone right now based on this list. We may, based on the agreement of the committee, decide that we want to hear from someone else. So I'm in agreement with that.