Thank you for the question, Mr. Angus.
I hope at a later point in time I get an opportunity to address the other part of your question, which Professor Geist dealt with, because I don't agree with that.
Concerning this situation, I believe that artists are losing revenues, as you've said. The broadcast mechanical is an example.
Is this a constitutional violation? I think the answer is clearly not. Parliament has control over how it legislates with respect to copyright and, in my view, even with respect to TPMs it certainly would have constitutional control under the way the Constitution Act has been construed. As long as it rounds out a scheme with respect to copyright, there would be constitutional authority. There's no doubt that TPMs are there.
With respect to the broadcast mechanical, it's a question of policy: is it good or bad? I think a lot of people didn't see this one coming, frankly. I certainly think the rights holders didn't see it coming. Parliament can do it if they want, but whether they ought to do it is another question.