Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
This is a fascinating conversation, but I think there's a lot of confusion. First I'd like to respond to some of what I've heard, and this isn't my question.
Mr. Sookman, it seems you've indicated that the intent of the bill is bang on what you're looking for, especially in relation to the BitTorrent sites and so forth. You're looking for some wording changes to tighten the bill so there aren't any loopholes. Perhaps you could recommend in writing to the committee where you'd like to see the amendments you've spoken about, specifically with respect to enabling infringement.
Ms. D'Agostino, just to shorten a little bit what you said, we need to define “education”. If you have a recommendation as to how the bill might do that, I'd love to see it.
Mr. Geist, I still feel there's an awful lot of misunderstanding on the opposition side with respect to what fair dealing means and what they are proposing, which sounds a lot more like free dealing. They are indicating that if something is fair dealing, therefore it's all going to be free. For the benefit of everyone in the room, could you please explain the difference between fair dealing and what has been termed “free dealing”, which is what I think has been presented in some cases?