Well, it would leave some flexibility in the framework for the government through, essentially, regulation. We have established an entire process to formulate the exact specificity needs of what we mean by education.
For instance, one question I have is whether we include course packs for universities. That's something I'm still not clear on. There is also the example I raised about the school for English as a second language; I'm not clear on that either.
If we look at CCH and the six factors, in a sense I don't think the provision would be broadly interpreted, because there is a safety net with the CCH factors. At the same time, it's still a feeling I have and not a certainty. What I would like is a bit more certainty and a bit more evidence amassed to have a more concrete, evidence-based approach. That's why I'm not really comfortable with the way it is now. I think and I sense that there is something we should be doing. If we put in a term like that, I just don't know if it's going to really achieve what we're trying to get at. If there is something we should do, then maybe we should look at it a bit more carefully.