I think that the enablement provision is helpful in that regard. I don't have a problem with it. I think it needs to ensure that we don't have unintended consequences. At the same time, if those are tools that can help in terms of targeting some of the bad actors, I think that's just fine. I think it's appropriate.
I do think, however, that it is important to recognize that some of those same tools already exist within the Copyright Act. One of the problems we have faced has been the reluctance of some of the rights holders to go after those sites in the first place. There have been a couple of instances in which they have targeted Canadian-based BitTorrent sites, and those sites have stopped. There is one case now involving isoHunt. It's quite clear that those groups would be quite anxious to, or are prepared to, make the argument that Canadian copyright law does not, as it currently stands today, permit certain kinds of authorization of infringement activities.
It's not just about MPs crafting laws to give new tools. It's also about rights holders exercising some of those rights against those particular bad actors, recognizing that what we want to target are the commercial cases of infringement and that by and large we want to leave the non-commercial individual personal property issues aside.