That's fair, but perhaps more confusing for a committee that has to come up with an answer on definitions that may be broadly defined. I guess the concern we have, as members, is subjecting all of these words to the possibility of legal challenge and almost forcing this to be a precedent-setting matter for down the road. I think we would certainly want more certainty and understanding as to whether these things left alone as they currently stand, as opposed to adding a new addition of education as defined under fair dealing, may lead to unintended consequences.
Madam Gendreau, you suggested earlier, and I think it's here written, that fair dealing for the purpose of education is an exception that goes against the three-step test. You sit on the IPIC. How do you reconcile that with your lawyer colleagues?