I don't think you could use that language; it wouldn't be effective. But you could certainly craft language that would much more focus the UGC section. If that's to be done, let's get the right language. But it could be done, yes.
December 6th, 2010 / 5:10 p.m.
Chair, Copyright Legislation Committee (Technical), Intellectual Property Institute of Canada
I don't think you could use that language; it wouldn't be effective. But you could certainly craft language that would much more focus the UGC section. If that's to be done, let's get the right language. But it could be done, yes.
See context to find out what was said next.