I wouldn't put the notion of levy for private copying in the same bag because this is not about an analysis based on a copyright exemption. In my view, compliance with international agreements should not be established on the basis of the three-step test. As for fair dealing for education purposes, yes, that's an exemption that I believe should be analyzed based on the three-step test. Transitory recording in another possibility. As a result of these issues, the exemptions to copyright that should be examined should not prejudice authors' legitimate interests. It must always be borne in mind that the object of a copyright act is to establish compensation for authors and for copyright holders who indirectly benefit from these rights.
I'll give you an example. No one would be surprised to see that the object of a consumer protection act is to favour consumers in their relations with merchants. Of course, when you consider drafting consumer protection legislation, you say to yourself that the conditions must be reasonable for the manufacturers, sellers and merchants. You cannot impose excessive obligations on them. Nevertheless, the basic policy is still the protection of consumers' interests.
Somewhat the same thing is true of the Copyright Act. The basic policy, the one that the international treaties represent and with which we have been living for 300 years, is that these laws protect the interests of persons whose creations are of that kind.