Yes, absolutely. I think the key for us is linking circumvention to infringement and making sure that is very clear. We have no problem with digital locks for preventing infringement. That scene is totally reasonable to us. It's when it's a non-infringing purpose that it becomes a concern.
You're bringing up the idea of documentary filmmakers, and certainly it's something we are concerned about because news reporters have the fair dealing right to use copyrighted work for news, but if a digital lock trumps that fair dealing right and works behind a lock, it would become unreportable, unstudiable, uncriticizable, and that would be a step backwards.
So if you are linking it to infringement...and make sure that it's still carved out that if it's for a fair dealing purpose, you can circumvent in that particular instance. I'm glad to hear there's so much support for CCH and the six-part test, and that might be a way to adjudicate those peripheral disputes. But we think a balance can be struck there.