I think it's quite clear that, as CCH v. Law Society has shown and to paraphrase Dr. Geist, fair dealing is not free dealing. There's a balance that has to be struck. You have to make contextual decisions. It's important to recognize that CCH was a decision about the use of a library. It was about learning materials. It used the context of learning to decide whether or not a library was overreaching in how it distributed content.
These contextual decisions are important, and we think there is protection through the court system to make sure that creators are not having their rights taken away. In fact, one of the provisions in the six-part test within CCH is “What's the effect on the marketplace?” We think that's a crucial question and we fully agree with that.