First of all, if I may, it's not the iPod tax. It's not a tax. It's one way--it can be described as a tax, but it's not a tax--of compensating the use of the right of property. If we can't find a better system.... We had one before and the technology has made it completely obsolete. What this bill is proposing is that there's no alternative for the smaller guy. There's no alternative for the hundreds of thousands of small artists across this country in a number of disciplines. That's the problem. So it was not a tax; it's been labelled as such, and politically it's a good football.
We're looking for alternative solutions. One of the opposition parties has put a solution on the table. It's not ideal either, but it's something to look at. I don't know, but my pleading to you is “don't take that money away”.
The second point is that you say it's my industry, and it's not my industry; I'm a very large coalition of organizations of all kinds, so it's not my $126 million. There are so many millions for musicians and so many millions for writers and so many millions for visual artists. For visual artists, by the way—I'll take the opportunity—this is something that you could--