We won't continue going on with this, but I know, having spoken with John Greyson, that he's very concerned about having to ask the permission of some copyright holders who'll say, “No, you're not doing parody and satire of my work, so end of story.” We put in a provision for parody and satire, and someone who doesn't want to be parodied says no. So I do believe we're going to have to come back to this.
I'm interested in the issue of the commercial infringement versus personal use, because I think we're all agreed we want to make sure that widespread commercial infringement is not destroying our business markets. The problem we again go back to is that your biggest threat is your fans. They're posting stuff because they love it. That's going to continue as our business models are changing. For example, Facebook--who would have thunk it?--is now the number one driver of eyeballs to online content.
How do we ensure that we're not destroying the very fan base that actually wants to support? This is their way of getting the works out there so you guys are remunerated, without, basically, suing the kids who love Degrassi and want to put it out there so they can see it.