I'm interested in the discussion on language around the fair dealings, because I think, for all of us as legislators, it has already been defined by the Supreme Court, so it's the elephant in the room. We have to come up with language on fair dealing. I see there's a certain amount of apprehension because there are elements in this bill--for example, subsection 30.9(6)--that specifically strike out collective licensing rights for copying. We are going to have to deal with this.
Mr. Pineau, with all due respect, I don't think as legislators we can simply say we're going to make fair dealing go away because it's been defined. What kind of language do we need to ensure that we're not opening the barn door, that we're ensuring that people are accessing the rights the courts have defined, but that collective licensing is not unduly undermined to the point that we're going to see serious impact?