I guess it's that issue of the continuum, because I've spoken with documentary filmmakers who are very concerned about the digital lock provisions preventing them from being able to excerpt works that are under copyright. If anything has a lock on it, they're not going to be able to use it. I asked one witness, and they said, “You can take a screen shot of a computer.” You can't do quality work with a screen shot of a computer.
That's a legitimate work, where you're creating a new work, and you're going to have to make reference. If you're going to do a history of Canadian movies, you're going to have to be able to show those movies. If right now they're only under digital lock, you're going to have to find a way to do that. That, to me, is fundamentally different from saying, “If you don't like a digital lock, you can just take it off, and then you can go and do what you want with the film.”
Do you, as an organization, see an ability for us to narrow the language so that we are making sure it's not actually interfering with the ability of artists to create works?