Sir, I don't doubt that you are acting in good faith, but from the standpoint of rigour, your bill is flawed because you cannot provide us with any relevant data.
For example, why isn't manslaughter or firearms-related criminal negligence included in the list of offences to be added to the existing list of offences subject to the reverse onus scheme? What reason did you have for singling out these particular offences? Why did you exclude criminal negligence and manslaughter from the list?