On the issue, Minister, of an individual who is already under a weapons prohibition, I think the current situation would come as a surprise to many Canadians. I'm wondering if we can walk through that a bit, the scenario where my understanding is that this person has already had a brush with the law and is under an order not to be in possession of a weapon, and then this bill contemplates that if the person is involved in an indictable offence that involves a firearm, they too would have a reverse onus.
Ms. Besner mentioned how the reverse onus is applied to the more serious firearms offences, firearms trafficking and possession. Is this also, do you feel, at that higher threshold? In this situation where the person is already under a firearms prohibition order and now they've gone out and used a firearm in the commission of an indictable offence, do you feel this also meets that charter requirement, that interpretation, that there be some distinguishing between a low-level and a higher-level offence?