Yes, we're popular too. I think our crime agenda is certainly contributing to the well-being of the government at the present time.
I think one of the things that should be underlined here is that the justices of the peace in your example ultimately have the right to make the decision they believe is in the best interest of the public. Giving them more tools or explaining to them the options they have, or indeed placing an onus on an individual who quite clearly, in my opinion, should demonstrate why they should be released, are steps in the right direction. But ultimately, if the justices of the peace in your constituency or others find that all these individuals should be released and that they're not satisfied that for the protection of the public, for people's respect for the administration of justice, or indeed if there's not a problem with individuals possibly reoffending, they have that right. They can release any or all of them, for that matter. But I think it's incumbent upon us as legislators to give them guidance in line with what I think most Canadians would think is very reasonable.
In my opening comments I said we're just building, basically, on the principles that are in the Criminal Code now that have been affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada.