I now move to my second question. We are talking about reverse onus in bail cases. The Criminal Code calls for reverse onus in cases of possession of stolen goods. The lawyer has to show... We have cases where lawmakers, without any statistics whatsoever, have reversed the onus. We lawyers have to do it. We are talking about bail. It is different, we understand that.
But I would like to ask you a question that was raised by Mr. Bagnell and Mr. Lee. It has to do with the time spent in detention while bail is being considered counting double, and whether the judge takes that into account when the person in custody hears his sentence at the end of the process.
In Quebec, we have this peculiar phenomenon, and you have the same thing too. Some of our clients are asking to be sentenced to more than two years plus a day, because they know that they will serve a sixth of the sentence rather than two thirds. We have clients who want to be sent to a federal prison rather than a provincial one. Do you have the same phenomenon, and does it have an effect on bail applications?