That's it exactly. In fact, there's also a bit of a kickback, if you will, in a judicial sense. By this, I mean that after we had some really shocking gun cases in Toronto, for a short period of time there almost became judge-made law reversing the onus on gun cases, just by virtue of the holding that a judge made regarding a particular bail. Then the crowns would use that holding and say, yes, the law is changing, even though the law hadn't changed. It was like a common law development.
The kickback was other jurists saying, no, the law has not changed; it is exactly as it was before. So this creates a debate, and we have a judicial debate. I'm sure your researchers could dig out the cases reflecting that very debate.