Regarding the example I was using, don't make trafficking in all narcotics a reverse onus, which is the way the law is now, as I understand it. But instead, look at the reversal in the context of the changes that have been made to the new narcotic control act. They have clearly identified a hierarchy of trafficking offences.
For example, trafficking in less than 30 grams of marijuana can be an absolute jurisdiction, a magistrate offence. You don't get a preliminary; you don't get anything of that nature. The question is whether that needs to be a reverse onus offence. It is presently. That's what I meant by looking at other pieces of legislation: are there presently reverse onuses?