Just let me get my last question in here.
The examples you gave in which reverse onus is used are serious, and a lot of people consider these offences serious. I'm sure someone in their questioning is going to bring up that there are a number of offences that occur when people are on bail. These offences that are committed while people are on bail are obviously serious offences, the reason for which reverse onus was put on the other ones, so why would we not put this in to further protect the citizenry?