I think I misspoke myself, which is not surprising. I wasn't talking about the bad guys. I was talking about the very difficult situation for people charged with offences to mount a package to support their release. My suggestion is that these people are not going to have jobs to go to, are not going to have families who support them and who will come forward as sureties, and will not probably have the roots in the community to get over the onus. I'm not holding any flag for people who are found to be bad guys after a trial, but what I'm saying is that the reverse onus makes it extremely difficult for persons to fashion a package of support in the community, so that a judge would think the risk is manageable.
That's what I was talking about. It's not the persons themselves, but it's the community support, the employer, etc., that they're obviously going to need to satisfy the onus.