Right. But, to be logical, the constitutional right needs to be overturned. There would be so many equally serious offences that you would almost have to ask for a kind of amendment to the Charter.
A number of offences that are more serious, or perceived as such by Canadians, are not included in the bill. I suppose the reason is simple: to go further, we would have to go a lot further. This shows how dangerous and potentially useless it is to bring forward eight amendments for eight types of offences. How many types of offences are there in the Criminal Code? You have to act in accordance with the basic philosophy of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This philosophy was established by Canadians: it calls for reasonable bail, and it should not be overturned unless the prosecution can show just cause.