Thank you very much.
I fully accept that it's an incredibly difficult dilemma. That's really what I was trying to illustrate in my statement. In principle, this course of action should be a last resort. We should be trying to do everything possible to prevent further deterioration of the situation. On the other hand, as I said in my statement, we have to recognize that Hong Kong is now in very grave danger. There are individuals who are currently in very grave danger.
My direct answer to you is that we should be doing both. We should be trying to use whatever tools we have to put pressure on the authorities to stop this erosion of freedoms, but simultaneously, for those who need to get out now and who might potentially be prevented from doing so if the situation deteriorates further, we should be trying to get them out now. Ultimately, individuals will make their own decisions as to whether they want to stay and continue the struggle or get out. For those who do need to get out, I think not only Canada but also the free world should be working together to coordinate a plan to enable them to do so. That might involve some form of asylum for some, but it may also involve study and young talent programs and other schemes that together we could come up with.
I hope that answers the question.